17
NetWit wins
4
AutoGen wins
5
Ties
26 features, side by side.
Legend: ✓ has · ✗ lacks · ⚠ limited · "framework" = library, "runtime" = product
Runtime & Orchestration
Deployment & Compliance
Developer Experience
Cost & Time
The honest comparison.
AutoGen verdict
A research-grade framework, not a product.
AutoGen is what you'd pick if you want to build a research agent from scratch. It's flexible, it's open-source, it has a strong group-chat primitive, and Microsoft Research has a strong track record.
Best for
Researchers. Open-source teams. Academic projects.
Gap
No production runtime. No pre-built agent catalog. No F50 track record. No compliance posture. You're building the production layer from scratch.
NetWit verdict
A 12-agent production runtime.
NetWit is what you pick when you need the same 12 agents in production at an F500, with on-prem posture, audit trail, MNPI enforcement, and a runtime that survives the GC review.
Best for
F500 / mid-cap / regulated operators.
Advantage
12 pre-built agents. Worktree audit trail. MNPI boundary. F50 production track record. Air-gapped deployable.
The bottom line
AutoGen is a strong research framework. NetWit is what you'd build if you took AutoGen, shipped 12 pre-built agents, added the audit trail, and ran it in production at an F500.
See NetWit in your stack